Ethereum Spot ETFs Underperform: Four Key Factors
Advertisements
For countless investors, the launch of Ethereum's (ETH) spot exchange-traded fund (ETF) has been met with disappointmentSince its inception in July, the performance of Ethereum ETFs contrasts sharply with that of Bitcoin ETFs, which have attracted an impressive influx of almost $19 billion in funds over a mere ten-month periodThis discrepancy begs the question: why is the interest in Ethereum ETFs lagging behind?
One pivotal point of comparison lies in performance metricsBitcoin ETFs, such as those launched by BlackRock (IBIT) and Fidelity (FBTC), not only broke records but also set a new standard for success in the investment arenaDuring their first month post-launch, IBIT and FBTC garnered $4.2 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively, overshadowing even the previously successful Climate Conscious Fund, which collected $2.2 billion in August 2023.
The ETF Store President, Nate Geraci, noted that while the Ethereum ETFs may not have created headlines, several of them still managed to rank among the top 25 ETFs for the year
Notably, BlackRock's ETHE attracted nearly $1 billion, Fidelity's FBTC pulled in $367 million, and Bitwise's ETHW accumulated $239 million—remarkable figures for funds only a couple of months old.
However, a significant shadow looms over these achievements: the substantial redemptions faced by Grayscale’s ETHEInitially established as a trust in 2017, the fund was bound by regulatory constraints that prevented investors from redeeming their ETF shares, effectively trapping funds within the productWhen Grayscale finally received approval for converting to an official ETF on July 23, ETHE boasted approximately $1 billion in assets, only to afterwards face an outflow near $3 billion.
This stark scenario raises questions not just about the funds themselves, but about the broader implications of supply and demand in the cryptocurrency marketIt might be beneficial to remember that Grayscale's Bitcoin ETF (GBTC) faced similar struggles, having dealt with an outflow exceeding $20 billion since January; however, the robust performance of BlackRock and Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETFs helped offset these losses.
Another critical differentiator between Bitcoin and Ethereum comes from the staking mechanism prevalent in the Ethereum network
- AI's Potential Risks: Surpassing Nuclear Concerns?
- Bitcoin, Nasdaq Surge as Dollar Assets Rally
- The Rise of AI in Interbank Business
- NVIDIA: The Top Choice for Retail Investors in 2024
- Extreme Sports Crisis: PR Lessons Learned
Investors can lock up their ETH to earn staking rewards, approximately 3.5% at presentUnfortunately, current ETF structures do not permit investors to stake their holdings, resulting in a scenario where they might miss out on yields while simultaneously paying management fees ranging from 0.15% to 2.5%. This poses a dilemma for investors, particularly those well-versed in crypto, who might seek alternative methods of holding Ethereum to capitalize on staking opportunities.
As Adam Morgan McCarthy, an analyst at Kaiko Research, pointed out, the appeal of staking may render Ethereum ETFs less attractive, especially for seasoned managers who understand the intricacies of the crypto markets"If you can access ETH exposure through a custodian like Coinbase or simply buy the asset and stake it yourself, the allure of an ETF diminishes," he stated.
Moreover, there exists an educational barrier that Ethereum ETFs face
Understanding Ethereum’s core applications versus Bitcoin’s straightforward "digital gold" narrative can be dauntingWith Bitcoin having a capped supply of 21 million, it’s easier for investors to grasp its value proposition as a hedge against inflationContrarily, Ethereum’s decentralized and open-source smart contract platform's complexity complicates its allure for potential investors.
Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted earlier this year that “as Ethereum ETFs try to penetrate the Baby Boomer-dominated 60/40 investment world, they must distill their purpose and value into easily digestible messages." This complexity also prompted the crypto index fund Bitwise to launch an educational campaign focusing on Ethereum’s technological advantages, underscoring the necessity to demystify Ethereum.
Interestingly, year-to-date performance data offers additional context
Since January 1, ETH has only risen about 4%, compared to Bitcoin’s impressive 42% increase, which has seen it hover near historical peaks from 2021. Brian Rudick, head of research at GSR, explained that the mere fact of a Bitcoin ETF launching amidst a bullish phase helped sustain investor excitement"ETH's 30% price drop since the ETF launch hasn't exactly fostered enthusiasm among retail buyers," he commented.
Lastly, the valuation of ETH presents another hurdleCurrently valued at approximately $290 billion, ETH ranks as the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization and sits above all banks except for JPMorgan and Bank of AmericaThis raises further questions about whether traditional investors consider ETH an attractive investment at current levelsIndeed, Quinn Thompson, founder of crypto hedge fund Lekker Capital, expressed skepticism towards ETH's valuation, likening it to apples compared to oranges